Gërdëc tragedy / Bamir Topi recalls constitutional changes a few days later: Berisha’s power was in danger

Bamir Topi: For me, March 15 was a very serious event, but then other problems arose, in the national security advisory meeting that I organized after a week. It turned out that there was a lack of transparency. All the representatives we were dealing with discussed at the consultation meeting.

The man when he is in that position, gets information, from the sources I got information that sporadic talks had started, about what was not known, but a political pact that was revealed a little later, which was not difficult. In the law committee, a former deputy of Shkodra, with a letter which contained important things, makes a proposal. For the sake of ethics I do not want to express it. It does not matter who the deputy was. He says that I think there should be a significant change in the relationship between the president and the prime minister. The president was the last stage of the decree, the lady proposed to be counter-signed by the prime minister. This provoked strong reaction, but today I am convinced that it was a shashke. The talks started 2-three days after Gerdec, the talks started. We are the small place, things come out exposed. Thankfully, even though we passed covid, my memory is very strong. I will remember the moment at 1, March 15 at the military hospital. I made my visit and left and from TV I see that in the hospital the former prime minister meets Rama who was accompanied by Brace. That shrug as if the house slaves had died. It was a scene that did not suit him. The events that followed, it was there that the need for another political communication began. The shoulder pounding was a reflective moment, from it came the need. It was clear that Berisha’s government had received a strong blow, it seemed that his overthrow would be very fast. It was neither the time nor the need to make constitutional changes. Those changes were not just for the president or the parties, but with the motion of no confidence in the prime minister. Guarantee to the next prime minister not to be fragile. Then they introduced another change, so that the majority would not fall into crisis

top channel